A positive "HIV" test comes from detecting some of the ("stress") proteins that are common in the blood of people stressed or ill from any of a great number of conditions; see "The Case against HIV" for details http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
Your “Case Against HIV” and your “Origin, Persistence and Failings of the hiv theory” alongside the work of Dr Peter Duesberg have stood irrefutable and unfailingly accurate for the nearly 40 years since an October 1987 clinic warned me that unless I immediately began treatment with the then promising AZT i would be dead in 6 months to 2 years.
Had learned of Duesberg’s dissent to the hiv theory six months earlier. Didn’t begin AZT.
NOT DEAD YET!
Interestingly, the first friend I knew personally to die from AIDS died two years later. He had secretly been taking AZT for months to fight the “HIV” infection he also kept secret.
Every single friend, hero and loved one i have lost to “AIDS” since then -that number is countless- had one thing in common.
Every single one of them followed prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Case closed.
Thank You Henry Bauer for your irrefutable persistence in pursuing and revealing the truth about this issue.
HIV is a hoax. As with COVID, a pathogenic “HIV” virus has never been proven to exist. As with the COVID PCR test, HIV tests are meaningless (in terms of detecting this so-called “virus”). People diagnosed with HIV/AIDS are suffering from other diseases simply renamed as “AIDS” or suffering from the AIDS treatments themselves. As Dr. Michael Yeadon says, “AIDS isn’t a new, single, distinct syndrome which hadn’t been seen before…This is because they’d literally made it up.” The video “House of Numbers” gives good background. https://www.bitchute.com/video/knG2GtP5nK3r
'HIV' certainly doesn't follow Farr's Laws. Crazy to think a flat temporal incidence curve could be the cause of an upswing in and the decline in a syndrome. My understanding is that of the total number of people said to be 'HIV positive' in the United States, it's estimated that 1/4 of them are either unaware of their status or 'untreated'. Given that, I wonder why we don't have a consistent group of people showing up in hospitals with kaposi's sarcoma, PCP or other AIDS defining illnesses. That 1/4" of total 'infected' has to be as large as the early number of 'infected' back in the early 80s when gay men seemed to be dying in droves. I have a friend who within a several span lost around 150 friends. He said he was basically going to a funeral every other weekend.
Thank you. And according to a recent San Francisco Chronicle article, "almost three-quarters of people living with HIV are 50 or older" What to make of that?
So many of us from the 80s, 90’s grew up hard-programmed to believe the lie, and so the ones in our 40s, 50s have found it hard to break out of that casket.
It takes psychologically courageous and persevering people to question/go against the main stream. The people on this substack are some of them!
I have commuted to jobs in San Francisco for years. The city seems to have adopted stories about itsellf, much like a mascot. AIDS is one such. The city tolerates (affectionately) its homosexual population and their use of drugs. The Chronicle, which relies on sales to residents, can be relied upon to support the "gays are good" story line. Of which the statistic that older gays are "living" with HIV is one.
I mean I get what you’re saying but it still doesn’t answer the question. The reason I’m asking is that I follow Dr. Sam Bailey and her unmasking the Covid virus fraud. She is a believer that there’s no such thing as a “virus” but that leaves the question what is Covid and hiv if there’s no specific answer. I mean Lyme and Mold lowers the immune system and has similar symptoms as hiv. So that begs the question to what is this hiv thing ? Is it a parasite ? Enlight me!
It is the occasional response of this sort that makes all the difference --- because the powers-that-be don't change their ways.
I spent a lifetime career thinking that getting facts would bring universal benefits, and it is saddening to have to realize that isn't so, that "might is right" remains humankind's actual practice
In my view the epidemiology of diagnoses and cases is the biggest argument against the notion of HIV diagnoses necessarily representing and infectious factor. In comparison with many other aspects of it, this has absolutely massive positive evidence against it, rather than simply an absence of positive evidence for it.
Rebecca, as you'll probably actually read this, I just wanted to praise you for your courage in your career-undermining opinion in your writing as well. I've got your book on HIV.
I deliberately stay within the narrative of the virus existence claim and ask:
How could anyone, Fauci for example, know when and how "the virus" "arrived" in the US? There was no template for finding "the unknown" before the first "test". Even with the "template", a randomly puzzled together collection of fragments of unknown origin from the biological cellular waste of a single person, which a computer converted into a fictitious construction, based on another fictitious template according to the same principle, still no one could say what "arrived" where and when. Does anyone remember the "symptomless superspreaders"? A phenomenon, invisible without a test. If the "thing" actually existed outside of a computer simulation, it could have been around forever, because in terms of "symptoms" alone it was nothing new, nothing different than it had always been at that time of year, so nobody noticed or cared, to Fauci's great displeasure. He is sometimes frighteningly honest, probably out of arrogance, because he knows that nothing and nobody will hold him accountable. By saying that it really pisses him off how little people fear the "flu", he addressed the agenda early on. Therefore the handling of convid was suddenly out of all proportion, with the aim of finding out where people's red lines were. An army of hysterical hypochondriacs, always looking for the cause of all their ailments outside of their responsibility, have rolled out the red carpet for the organizers of the production instead of the red line, as is customary in Hollywood.
A friend of mine regularly tells me that one day the stupid ones will drag us all down into the abyss.
A positive "HIV" test comes from detecting some of the ("stress") proteins that are common in the blood of people stressed or ill from any of a great number of conditions; see "The Case against HIV" for details http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
See https://web.archive.org/web/20250305094201/https://www.thecaseagainsthiv.net/ for answers to all your questions
and read my book, The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory, McFarland 2007
It explains how the mistake started, among other things
Your “Case Against HIV” and your “Origin, Persistence and Failings of the hiv theory” alongside the work of Dr Peter Duesberg have stood irrefutable and unfailingly accurate for the nearly 40 years since an October 1987 clinic warned me that unless I immediately began treatment with the then promising AZT i would be dead in 6 months to 2 years.
Had learned of Duesberg’s dissent to the hiv theory six months earlier. Didn’t begin AZT.
NOT DEAD YET!
Interestingly, the first friend I knew personally to die from AIDS died two years later. He had secretly been taking AZT for months to fight the “HIV” infection he also kept secret.
Every single friend, hero and loved one i have lost to “AIDS” since then -that number is countless- had one thing in common.
Every single one of them followed prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Case closed.
Thank You Henry Bauer for your irrefutable persistence in pursuing and revealing the truth about this issue.
“HIV” is a LIE.
SARS-COV-2 has never been shown to exist either. No alleged virus has. Virology has always been a total sham.
Virology generates large paychecks.
HIV is a hoax. As with COVID, a pathogenic “HIV” virus has never been proven to exist. As with the COVID PCR test, HIV tests are meaningless (in terms of detecting this so-called “virus”). People diagnosed with HIV/AIDS are suffering from other diseases simply renamed as “AIDS” or suffering from the AIDS treatments themselves. As Dr. Michael Yeadon says, “AIDS isn’t a new, single, distinct syndrome which hadn’t been seen before…This is because they’d literally made it up.” The video “House of Numbers” gives good background. https://www.bitchute.com/video/knG2GtP5nK3r
'HIV' certainly doesn't follow Farr's Laws. Crazy to think a flat temporal incidence curve could be the cause of an upswing in and the decline in a syndrome. My understanding is that of the total number of people said to be 'HIV positive' in the United States, it's estimated that 1/4 of them are either unaware of their status or 'untreated'. Given that, I wonder why we don't have a consistent group of people showing up in hospitals with kaposi's sarcoma, PCP or other AIDS defining illnesses. That 1/4" of total 'infected' has to be as large as the early number of 'infected' back in the early 80s when gay men seemed to be dying in droves. I have a friend who within a several span lost around 150 friends. He said he was basically going to a funeral every other weekend.
I heard also from a friend who had lived in, I think Atlanta, who lost dozens of friends in a short time
May we please retire the fantasy that HIV causes AIDS?
I keep trying to help towards that
Thank you!
You got it!
Thank you. And according to a recent San Francisco Chronicle article, "almost three-quarters of people living with HIV are 50 or older" What to make of that?
https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/harry-breaux-aids-sf-20232948.php
So many of us from the 80s, 90’s grew up hard-programmed to believe the lie, and so the ones in our 40s, 50s have found it hard to break out of that casket.
It takes psychologically courageous and persevering people to question/go against the main stream. The people on this substack are some of them!
I have commuted to jobs in San Francisco for years. The city seems to have adopted stories about itsellf, much like a mascot. AIDS is one such. The city tolerates (affectionately) its homosexual population and their use of drugs. The Chronicle, which relies on sales to residents, can be relied upon to support the "gays are good" story line. Of which the statistic that older gays are "living" with HIV is one.
So what exactly is HIV?
it is not an entity
It has to be an entity. I get the whole idea it’s not a virus but there’s no specific answer on what’s hiv could be.
why does it have to be an entity? Pure HIV virions have never been isolated from an AIDS sufferer or from an "HIV-positive" individual
It is an IMAGINED, POSTULATED "thing"
So what’s causing aids ?
drug abuse, chiefly
I mean I get what you’re saying but it still doesn’t answer the question. The reason I’m asking is that I follow Dr. Sam Bailey and her unmasking the Covid virus fraud. She is a believer that there’s no such thing as a “virus” but that leaves the question what is Covid and hiv if there’s no specific answer. I mean Lyme and Mold lowers the immune system and has similar symptoms as hiv. So that begs the question to what is this hiv thing ? Is it a parasite ? Enlight me!
What is Hep A, B & C?
We know that flying viruses is a buncha Lysenko tomfoolery.
That’s the answer I’m looking , give me something else
It's a biomarker for premature aging.
Thank you Dr. Bauer. I’ve cross posted to my substack.
THANKS!
Henry
Thank you, Brother
It is the occasional response of this sort that makes all the difference --- because the powers-that-be don't change their ways.
I spent a lifetime career thinking that getting facts would bring universal benefits, and it is saddening to have to realize that isn't so, that "might is right" remains humankind's actual practice
In my view the epidemiology of diagnoses and cases is the biggest argument against the notion of HIV diagnoses necessarily representing and infectious factor. In comparison with many other aspects of it, this has absolutely massive positive evidence against it, rather than simply an absence of positive evidence for it.
Rebecca, as you'll probably actually read this, I just wanted to praise you for your courage in your career-undermining opinion in your writing as well. I've got your book on HIV.
"when covid came into the United States..."
I deliberately stay within the narrative of the virus existence claim and ask:
How could anyone, Fauci for example, know when and how "the virus" "arrived" in the US? There was no template for finding "the unknown" before the first "test". Even with the "template", a randomly puzzled together collection of fragments of unknown origin from the biological cellular waste of a single person, which a computer converted into a fictitious construction, based on another fictitious template according to the same principle, still no one could say what "arrived" where and when. Does anyone remember the "symptomless superspreaders"? A phenomenon, invisible without a test. If the "thing" actually existed outside of a computer simulation, it could have been around forever, because in terms of "symptoms" alone it was nothing new, nothing different than it had always been at that time of year, so nobody noticed or cared, to Fauci's great displeasure. He is sometimes frighteningly honest, probably out of arrogance, because he knows that nothing and nobody will hold him accountable. By saying that it really pisses him off how little people fear the "flu", he addressed the agenda early on. Therefore the handling of convid was suddenly out of all proportion, with the aim of finding out where people's red lines were. An army of hysterical hypochondriacs, always looking for the cause of all their ailments outside of their responsibility, have rolled out the red carpet for the organizers of the production instead of the red line, as is customary in Hollywood.
A friend of mine regularly tells me that one day the stupid ones will drag us all down into the abyss.
"In COVID'S Wake" is a very useful analysis of mis-management and some of its causes