I had focused my decades-long research in Science Studies on analyzing scientific controversies, including whether particular topics even deserve to be material for scientific study. That focus was undoubtedly determined by the fact that I had changed my academic career from chemistry to science studies through interest in a couple of topics that were regarded as not properly science and yet were held by a large body of enthusiasts to be authentic aspects of material reality: the so-called Loch Ness “monsters”, and the scenario of solar-system phenomena postulated by the psychoanalyst Immanuel Velikovsky in a popular best-selling books.
I'm fascinated by the epidemiology you mention. I've been aware of the Perth Group's work, and understand the mechanics for how many things can cause reactions. But I haven't delved deeply into the epidemiological anomalies. I want to read more about this.
Go to the website http://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
Sources are given for all those details
I had the link wrong; "confession" doesn't belong at the end. Use just
https://mega.nz/file/wegVGAqL#0kJGxh0KWMhW3OsZJUFonh6c7cetmCQAhJ-0b1B1aAo
I'll fix it on the substack, thanks for the heads-up
I'm fascinated by the epidemiology you mention. I've been aware of the Perth Group's work, and understand the mechanics for how many things can cause reactions. But I haven't delved deeply into the epidemiological anomalies. I want to read more about this.
ref. 3 requires some kind of "decryption key" - would you provide?